Like the rest, AI won’t take many jobs. It may take over redundant and tiresome duties but not the ones that need amazing human brains. Undoubtedly, paintings and arts fall into that category. So, there’s no need for artists to lose sleep over AI generators.

So, what’s the fuss about? Let us clear something up right here. No AI generator can ever replace artists. AI isn’t human and lacks a humanistic touch. Moreover, art enthusiasts will never accept the displacement of artists. But considering that, artists can take advantage of AI, right?

As Sun Tzu once said, “Keep your friends close and enemies closer”. Following the mantra, artists have found superb assistance in AI’s form. Instead of fearing, artists can befriend AI to be in an advantageous position.

How? Well, this article serves the purpose of proving how AI generators are beneficial for artists. We’ll explore how artists can up their game with AI. So, let’s get started:

IDEA GENERATION:

Often, artists find themselves in a conundrum situation. They explore ideas around them and still don’t find anything worth drawing. Why? Because they get overwhelmed by their surroundings.

However, AI is always at hand’s length to help them out. Using ChatGPT and Openart.ai, artists can seek help from AI. Using prompts, artists can filter out genius ideas. Sometimes, mingled thoughts don’t let them paint. So, AI tools can help clear their thoughts.

Not only this, AI generators can paint with minimal instructions. So, artists can get an initial outlook on their paintings. Also, it’ll assist them through the process of painting. However, artists generally don’t get help from an external source. But without a doubt, they won’t discard taking help from AI generators that can directly affect the end product.

Also, AI generators can be great for abstract painters. Sometimes, abstract painters lack idea generation. Even if they get the idea, they are clueless about painting it. So, AI generators can assist them in no time. Just roll out the prompt and see the results.

However, there’s an important thing to keep in mind. Such AI tools and generators usually don’t work as intended on a substandard connection. The reason is simple. It’s because they’ve tremendous loads of data and rolling it out on a subpar speed isn’t possible. So, they keep on dragging the results. Because neither a veteran nor an aspiring painter wants to lose touch when in a mood to create, check your connection first before seeking out help from such AI tools.

GLOBAL MARKET:

Most times, aspiring artists struggle to sell their artwork. They don’t often find the right market to sell their work. However, digital artists have been gaining a lot of traction lately. It appears they’ve hit a jackpot. But let’s clarify. They haven’t hit any jackpot or treasure chest. They’ve found the right market, and that market encompasses the entire globe.

Using AI tools, anyone can explore the trends among people. For example, you can find out what cereal is top-selling in the United States or what’s the price of tomatoes in Madrid today. Based on AI’s algorithm, you can find anything.

So, using AI tools, artists can explore people’s likes and dislikes. Considering that, they can come up with paintings that are trendy among the masses. Moreover, they can even sell them globally.

Using NFTs, painters can sell paintings digitally. NFTs are non-fungible tokens that are bought or sold digitally. Artists can convert physical paintings to digital assets on NFT platforms.

AUGMENTED REALITY:

AR infused with AI can be a game changer for painters. Some artists may find it troubling to picture scenery or objects while painting them down. However, AR can visualize anything for them.

With the help of AR, artists can access the color scheme, lighting, and different settings to maximize results. It’s like gazing at something before perfecting it and then painting it on a canvas. So, using AR, artists can achieve much more than they think.

PREVIEWING:

Most artists are quite conscious of their results and are looking for admiration and insights for their work. However, artists seldom get feedback on possible mistakes in their masterpieces.

AI generators can help them in this regard as well. Using a generator, they can upload images of their paintings for review. The AI generator will thoroughly access the painting and give recommendations. Such recommendations would be reasonable as well. Simply because they’d be coming out of a tool specially designed for the purpose. This way, they can act on the recommendations to make their work more appealing and saleable.

BOTTOM LINE:

There’s no need for artists to fear AI. In no sense should they be worried about AI displacing them. Instead, AI tools can work in their favor for the above reasons. Taking advantage of the technological advancements can assist them and secure their place in the world of art.

___________________________

Author’s Bio

Katherine S. Baker

Content Marketer at Local Cable Deals

Business graduate, a digital marketer by profession, and a writer by passion. Katherine loves to play Chess. She shares her expertise for several brands including Cox communications en español to improve their rankings on Google. Probably one of the most amazing things about her is her ability to stay relevant. Her work has been posted on multiple blogs and e-zines across the web.

The post 3 Reasons Why AI Isn’t an Artists Competitor appeared first on Art Business News.

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, released the DALL-E text-to-image art generator in January 2021 and its successor, DALL-E 2, the following April. Two other text-to-image AI systems, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, came out in 2022. It is well known that these models were created by training on millions of digital images downloaded from the web. This article has two goals: to provide a reader-friendly introduction to the copyright and right-of-publicity issues raised by such AI model training, and to offer practical tips about what art owners can do, currently, if they want to keep their works away from such training uses.

A GENTLE PRIMER ON GENERATIVE AI ART MODELS

Before diving in, it helps to have a big-picture sense of how generative AI art models are built and how users interact with them. The technical details are fascinating, but too complex to dwell on. Here’s the bare technological minimum to let us get to work:

• From the user’s perspective: You type in some text, e.g., “A vase of flowers with some orchids and other pretty things. Make the vase emerald blue, and the final image photorealistic.” You hit enter. The model runs, using conceptual linkages created during its training between millions of word labels and billions of image features to synthesize a new work, prompted by the criteria you typed in.

• Under the hood: As noted above, AI art generators are virtual neural networks defined by billions of numbers called “weights” or “parameters.” Model developers set those parameters by running millions of images, along with text labels for each image, through training algorithms. These training images aren’t stored as perfect bit-by-bit digital replicas. They are compressed into complex mathematical entities (vectors), each of which is a huge matrix of numbers. The word labels are similarly converted (“embedded”) into vectors and combined with their corresponding image vectors. The training algorithms then run each image-word vector through a series of incremental steps, first gradually adding and then gradually removing random noise from the vector. Through this “diffusion” process, the model adjusts the numerical values of its parameters to capture the conceptual linkages between the word concepts and image features. It may seem like magic, but it is a chain of probabilistic mathematical operations run on an incomprehensively massive scale.

Because of the intentional randomness inherent in this diffusion process, only rarely will an AI model output a copy of an original training image (or something close to it) in response to a text prompt. Even in those rare cases, close reproduction typically occurs only when a user deliberately forces that result through careful prompt selection. So if outright copying is unlikely at the output stage, what are the copyright and right-of-publicity issues at stake? We’ll focus on two of them.

TRAINING ON COPYRIGHTED ARTWORK

The first big issue many in the creative and tech industries are grappling with is the permissibility of reproducing training images as an intermediate step in the training process. Many text-to-image generators are trained on massive datasets, such as LAION-5B, that include many copyrighted images. Copyright protects against unauthorized electronic reproduction. The AI model’s neural-network parameters do not store digital copies of a training image, but interim copies are typically made temporarily during training, usually in the stage of converting images to vectors. At the same time, copyright has a fair use doctrine, permitting certain copying without permission of the owner based on balancing four factors, like whether the copier’s use is transformative and whether the copying would impact the value or potential market for the image. So the question arises: When a model developer copies a digital image for training—but the model never outputs that same original image—should the intermediate-step copying be excused by fair use?

IMITATING ARTISTIC STYLE

The other core issue is that text-to-image AI art generators often can reproduce elements of an artist’s style, even when the content of the synthesized image is not at all similar to the original work. Think of Van Gogh’s “Starry Night” and its distinctive stylistic aspects—the swirling, strong brushstrokes; the tones of the yellows and blues; and the soft light emanating seemingly from underneath. Now take that stylistic “skin” and apply it to a wholly different scene, a bowl of fruit, or an airport runway. Van Gogh’s style may be carried over, but a copyright claim is challenging. Because the content of the picture is fundamentally different, the work is not substantially similar. Generally, copyright protection does not extend to abstractions like styles standing alone.

Style transfer in AI art generators has received considerable attention. The best-known example is digital artist Greg Rutkowski, recognized for his dark moody fantasy scenes used in games like Dungeons & Dragons. At one point last fall, users had explicitly prompted Stable Diffusion to create images “in the style of Greg Rutkowski” over 93,000 times. Because the content of the synthesized images was different, a copyright claim would be a stretch. Another possibility is a right-to-publicity claim. Generally, this right guards against an unauthorized commercial use of a person’s name, likeness, persona, or identity. But courts, at least so far, have not clearly decided whether a visual artist’s style can qualify as a kind of “persona” or “identity,” nor have they discussed what level of distinctiveness may be necessary to create such “personas” or “identities,” nor how such distinctiveness is to be measured.

PRACTICAL TIPS

Eventually, courts will weigh in on these training data and style transfer issues. Earlier this year, Getty Images sued Stability, the company behind the Stable Diffusion model, in Delaware federal court over the use of Getty copyrighted photos in Stable Diffusion’s training. Similarly, a group of visual artists sued both Stability and Midjourney in California federal court over their copyrighted artwork and included right-to-publicity claims. But those cases are still in their early stages. It will take time before we receive clear, actionable guidance from the courts. In the meantime, what can artists concerned about style imitation nor training usage do?

Your current options are mostly technological, not entirely satisfactory, but better than nothing. First is detection. Software tools exist to help you determine whether an AI art model used a training dataset that included your image. The startup Spawning offers the free site Have I Been Trained? where you can upload your file and check to see whether it exists in the LAION-5B dataset used to train Stable Diffusion and other AI art generators. Or, if your artwork is highly distinctive, you can try to “hack” the model by experimenting with different text prompts to induce the model to output something close to your original image.

The next step is communication. If you believe your artwork was improperly used to train an AI model, you can write the developer’s legal department, identifying your images with specificity and asking them to remove those images from the training dataset. There’s no guarantee your request will be honored, but you will have provided notice of your objection. There are also ways to communicate your anti-scraping intent through metadata instructions. If you publish your artwork on your website, make sure the site’s “robot.txt” file includes tags prohibiting web crawlers. OpenAI recently announced that its GPTBot scraper would respect these tags. Similarly, DeviantArt, an online site where artists showcase and sell their digital works, includes a “NoAI” HTML tag by default for uploads to its platform. Also for individual digital images, the Adobe-led Content Authenticity Initiative has issued a technical standard—C2PA “content credentials”—for cryptographically binding a metadata “manifest” to images. The newest version of the standard (1.3) allows users to include an instruction in the manifest prohibiting AI model training on the image. Of course, these metadata systems are not ideal solutions, because they are not legally mandated or widely adopted yet. But they offer a promising path for future protection.

A final step you can take is prevention. Academics are developing and have released tools that would allow artists to electronically modify their digital artwork and photo files to inhibit their downstream reproduction. To specifically address the issue of style mimicry, a team at the University of Chicago developed Glaze, a software program that manipulates individual pixels to alter the style. The change is imperceptible to the human eye, but the AI art model is “tricked” into thinking the image has a different style, cubist instead of photorealistic, for example. Glaze is now publicly available to artists through the University of Chicago website. A similar tool, still in the prototype stage, is PhotoGuard from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. PhotoGuard alters digital photos, also at the pixel level, so that any AI-synthesized outputs using those photos have degraded appearances—key areas of the output may be grayed out, for instance.

PARTING THOUGHTS 

Issues around artistic style transfer and the use of copyrighted works as AI training data will be with us for the foreseeable future. Legitimate, provocative, vital debate between creators, developers, and the public continues in the news, in legislatures, and in the courts. But while we wait for the right balances to be struck, it behooves visual artists to understand both the basics of how AI image generators work and the technological tools available to them to help control unauthorized uses of their works. The times are ever-changing―and we must keep up with the times.

______________________________

Author Bio: 

Aleksander J. Goranin is a partner in the intellectual property practice of Duane Morris LLP. He is a software copyright and patent litigator and counselor, specializing in technology-driven cases, high-stakes problems, and turning the complex into the understandable. Alex is active in the leadership of the Copyright Society and co-chairs its AI Series of educational programming. At Duane Morris, he helps lead the firm’s AI Steering Committee and publishes its biweekly newsletter summarizing legal developments in artificial intelligence, The AI Update.

The post The Future of Digital Art as Training Material For Generative Artificial Intelligence Models appeared first on Art Business News.

Creativity is something that is usually related exclusively to humans. You may define it as the ability to generate ideas or concepts and unknown associations between existing ideas or concepts. But Artificial Intelligence (AI), a combination of algorithms created so that machines have the same capabilities as humans, seems to challenge this idea.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ART AND DESIGN – COMPUTATIONAL CREATIVITY

New technologies, especially artificial intelligence, are drastically changing the nature of creative processes. Computers play a vital role in creative activities such as music, architecture, art, and science. However, we believe that we need to strive for a more ambitious relationship between computers and creativity.

Instead of looking at computers only as a tool to help human creators, we can see them as creative entities. This vision has led to a new subfield of artificial intelligence called Computer Creativity.

To understand what the future holds for artificial intelligence in the art world, let’s first look at how things have recently shaped.

IN 2016

Sony’s FlowMachines

Scientists from Sony’s research laboratory launched FlowMachines, a neural network capable of generating music. It used a database with more than 13,000 songs from various genres as input to create Daddy’s Car, a song inspired by The Beatles.

This is not the only example of music generated with this tool. On the OpenAI research company’s website, you can find musical samples based on the work of renowned musicians in abundance. Some famous names include Elvis Presley, Pink Floyd, Frank Sinatra, Katy Perry, Radiohead, and Eminem.

IN 2018

World’s First AI-Generated Art Piece to be Auctioned

The world saw the Edmond de Belamy auction in 2018, the first painting produced with an AI program by the French art collective Obvious. The system was fed with data from 15,000 portraits painted between the 14th and 20th centuries for its creation. The image that resulted has airs of eighteenth-century painting. However, it’s not a painting but an ink print. When it was put up for auction at the Prints & Multiples sale in October 2018, Portrait of Edmond Belamy sold for an astonishing $432,500, signaling the arrival of AI art on the global stage.

IN 2019

A Random AI-Generated Image of a Person That Doesn’t Exist

A simple but revealing example of what artificial intelligence can do from data and a learning process is the face generator, thispersondoesnotexist.com. It is a website where artificial intelligence generates faces of people who do not exist. The site was created by San Francisco-based Uber software engineer Phillip Wang in 2019.

Although this version of the model is capable of generating human faces, it can theoretically mimic any source. Scientists are already experimenting with other purposes, including anime characters, fonts and graffiti. 

IN 2020

At the beginning of 2020 in Argentina, an Artificial Intelligence system wrote a chapter of the book The Future Will Be Art by Argentine journalist Mercedes Ezquiaga. The underlying intelligent system used hundreds of interviews, notes, and books that Ezquiaga had written in her 20-year career as a journalist to create a text that followed the author’s style.

With these and other experiences, the idea that machines “create” art has gained currency. The ability they develop to learn what works of art look or sound like and produce new, coherent, “in-style” versions of the original fuels the illusion that a creative Artificial Intelligence could replace the artist.

8 CONTEMPORARY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS TO CREATE ART

Many believe one of the ways to gauge the future prospects of any technological advancement is to see the kind of applications being developed using it. And, in this case, there are plenty.

1. Google AI – Chimera Painter

Google’s Chimera Painter is an AI art tool that takes your simple design to create a stunning image. It works by adding features and textures to your drawing to give it a realistic look. Although it is aimed at game developers primarily, the tool can be used by anyone who wants artificial intelligence to draw with a realistic look. 

2. Runway ML

Runway ML is video/photo editing and machine learning software for creatives. Its purpose is to “reimagine how we create” with a variety of innovative features. Its AI tools with machine learning can create AI art and transform photos or videos.

3. Artbreeder

Artbreeder is an AI art generator capable of generating an image by mixing any two images. This artificial intelligence tool can generate an infinite number of “child” frames from the two original frames.

4. Magenta

Magenta is an open-source research project with machine learning models that generate art. It specializes in manipulating source data like music and images to produce new art. And it’s not just an AI tool or AI art generator; it can also create music! 

5. js

The main goal of ml5.js is to make machine learning accessible to a broad audience of artists, creative programmers, and students. Plus, with an active and supportive user community, it’s a great place to get started in AI art.

6. Fotor GoArt

It is an art generator app that can create images and effects on your mobile device. It lets you export your AI image as a 10MP photo ready for print. Also, the app allows you to simulate painting styles like Van Gogh or Monet.

7. Luminar AI

Luminar AI is one of the AI art tools for photographers that work with Photoshop and Lightroom. It will be a huge time saver and will match all your photos to look stitched together even though they were taken with different cameras.

8. NVIDIA GauGAN Beta

Named after post-impressionist painter Paul Gauguin, this AI art generator can create realistic landscapes. You’ll be able to bring rivers, rocks, and clouds to life using basic tools that are then rendered as high-quality AI art. This AI tool is easy to use and free! 

TAKEAWAY

Recent advances in AI have led to the development of new algorithms and high-performance tools. This new relationship between man and artificial intelligence as a tool offers artists a new perspective of creation and reflection.

Artificial intelligence will make it easier to design and produce works of art, and everyone will have access to opportunities they never dreamed of. Artificial intelligence in art and design holds immense potential and a bright future. Though it might have to wade through a handful of challenges, people will eventually accept it and make use of it.

Author Bio: Waqas, a tech-obsessed millennial with over a decade of industry exposure, is currently associated with RevolveAI as a senior tech writer. Loves reading, writing, vacationing, and

The post Artificial Intelligence in Art and Design appeared first on Art Business News.

Chatbot technology is quite standard, and if you’re a frequenter of the Book of Ra slot game, you’ve probably interacted with it. Despite its popularity, many experts in the field still consider it to be in its infancy stage. However, since appearing in the 1960s, chatbot technology is making leaps and bounds on interaction and engagement with humans. Before we get into the intricacies of the subject matter, let’s start from the beginning. 

What Is Chatbot Technology Anyway, and Most Importantly, Why Is It Such a Big Deal? 

Chatbot technology is a computer program based on AI. It’s used to process and interpret user questions by simulating natural human conversation. Ideally, when you interact with a chatbot service, you expect to have an experience similar to that of a normal conversation with another human being. 

The only difference is that you ask the questions, and the technology has programmed answers to your problem. Chatbot technology was first created in 1964, thanks to the MIT AI Lab and Joseph Weizenbaum, a computer scientist. ELIZA, the first chatbot, simulated a psychotherapist by integrating pattern matching and programmed responses.

Today, there are many different applications of chatbots across various industries. Businesses can no longer ignore how cost-effective chatbot technology is. Drawing closer home, during the COVID-19 pandemic, large organizations, such as WHO and the CDC, rely on it to disseminate related info to millions of users. 

Adopting chatbot technology is essential to any business that’s keen to reduce its customer service burden while still ensuring that it can address concerns expressed by its clients. In a way, it helps sieve and prioritizes tasks for a business or whoever interacts with it. The most famous chatbot, Alexa (Amazon), is designed for home use. 

Chatbots in the Art Market

As many more industries embrace chatbot technology, the art market isn’t lagging. Recently, art museums and online art galleries implemented it as well. For example, Emma is a front-end technology that helps buyers find art that matches their unique preferences on ArtFinder. If you want to experience the benefits of using Emma, log in to Twitter, and see how this chatbot technology can help you find masterpieces that speak to your soul.

On the commercial front, commercial chatbots such as Morph, Botengine, Bold360, and Botisfy continue to reveal how customer support is changing with the use of AI. The art scene’s revolution is epic, as technology is evolving to learn how to create art pieces.

Everywhere you care to look, including online casinos, there’s chatbot technology. Take, for instance, the Museum of Modern Art in San Francisco. The center uses an SMS chatbot known as “Send Me SFMOMA.” It helps boost interaction, engage users, and make the museum’s vast art collection more accessible to audiences by countering user questions.

Using “Send Me SFMOMA,” audiences of museums can view previously unseen artwork focused on their interests rather than only what is on display in the museum. To access the collection, all you have to do is type in a “send me” SMS request in addition to a matching keyword or color to a provided number. 

Emoji addicts can get in on the loop by simply typing in a word and their favorite emoji. The museum’s chatbot technology will scan your request alongside the collection and respond with an appropriate image. 

In Belarus, the National Art Museum uses chatbot technology for similar functions, albeit in different capacities. The institution takes advantage of chatbots to offer visitors an online guide and improve correspondence. 

One of the most remarkable examples of how chatbot technology has impacted the art market is through MuseumBot. The AI makes works of art more approachable by integrating data, machine learning, and records to attract art aficionados to the growing field. 

More Than Customer Service

Our discussion above shows that museums and art centers are using chatbot technology to encourage interaction between audiences and institutions. Consequently, chatbot technology trends are evolving from considerations reserved for customer service to complex innovations. 

Chatbot technology is not only useful for disseminating information. Perhaps, through art, it will show us the symbiotic relationship between tech and the past. 

Additionally, with Natural Language Processing (NLP), incredible innovations and technology are bound to come through to help humans understand the world through art infused with chatbot technology. 

Take, for example, consider how the Pinacoteca de Sao Paulo Museum uses chatbot technology. With headphones and a smartphone, you can “talk” to the art pieces displayed at the institution.  

As you approach art exhibitions, use your assistant — in this case, their chatbot technology — to answer queries about different sculptures and paintings close to you. The museum’s chatbot technology is designed to answer complex questions such as the different styles the artist used or even expound on the elements on which the artwork was set.

This is an example of how we can use chatbot technology to aid growth in the industry and general learning. Using such kinds of learning experiences, people of all ages and intellectual capabilities can have the ultimate experience in cultural institutions, museums, and art centers. 

Additionally, chatbot technology plays a vital role in appealing to many who have never made an effort to visit such places for the simple reason that they aren’t interactive or utterly “boring.” 

Chatbot technology has shown how vital it is when used for business. Therefore, it can prove to be as useful in situations that call for learning, such as centers dedicated to cultural creativity. 

Technology is vital to improving our understanding of not just the world, but our relative realities. It can, in essence, form an extension of the human being and used as a vehicle for more technological advancements. 

Conclusion

As you interact with chatbot technology and other different kinds of bot techs, keep your mind open to what it can do for you. Have you interacted with any chatbot technology? What was the experience? Other than the tech used in your home or what you interact with on business websites, have you tried others? Tell us about the different chatbot technology you’ve dealt with, especially those related to art. We’d love to know.

___________________________________

Thomas Glare demonstrates his expertise through various social media management pieces. Through various blogs, he has helped a significant number of social media managers succeed. He also consults for various websites and online businesses, such as Book of Ra. 

Link: https://thefrisky.com/how-technology-opened-avenues-for-gaming-enthusiasts/

The post How is Chatbot Technology Changing the Art Scene? appeared first on Art Business News.